Officers regarded the training as beneficial: 70 percent reportedly gained a better understanding of implicit bias and more than two-thirds reportedly learned new strategies and skills that they expected to apply to their work. However, the quashing of the permission and the outcome in Kelton v Wiltshire Council [1] reinforce the importance of impartial and open decision-making in the planning process. Annual, mandatory implicit bias mitigation training sessions: All our application screeners and admissions committee members participate in 45-minute moderated discussions of implicit bias vignettes and evidenced-based strategies to reduce bias. ‘actual’ bias: this is where the decision-maker has a personal interest in the outcome of a case. In addition, SHA had been the only local, affordable housing provider to publicly support the scheme in front of the planning committee. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Imagine being able to quickly find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again. Sign-in
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer in order to track activity. While almost 70% of departments said they had implemented unconscious bias training for their officers, most did not have an evaluation process in place to know whether it was effective, and anecdotes from police officers suggested that the training is of a low quality and not reinforced. The outline permission gave rise to apparent bias. Take a free trial, The primary function of office-holders in personal and corporate insolvency is to collect in the assets belonging to a company or individual and to distribute these to the company's or individual's creditors. In this section you will learn how and when planning applications are decided and the options you have once a decision has been made. Duty to developer (planning) to disclose the facts – Council “nursing a lie”. The videos are intended for public use. 51. However, apparent bias is a more difficult concept. On 21 January 2015, Wiltshire Council (the Council), as local planning authority, granted outline permission for a scheme of up to 35 custom-built residential dwellings, including nine affordable homes, on land near the River Wylye in Warminster. In a key case before the High Court in late autumn 2015, the grant of outline planning permission for a residential development in Wiltshire was quashed after it was found that a Councillor’s private interest in the decision amounted to the appearance of bias. It was his vote that carried the decision in favour of outline permission being granted, but bias was alleged (as explained further below). Pre-determination is where the decision-maker approaches a decision with a ‘closed mind’. Our website distinguishes between cookies that are strictly necessary for the effective operation of the site and those that are not, such as analytical or third party cookies. However, the decision-making process must always be assessed from the perspective of a fair-minded and informed observer in the outside world. The Council’s screening opinion for Environmental Impact Assessment for the development was flawed. The reasonable and fair-minded observer, having the background facts, would have been aware that [SHA] had committed time, resources and expertise…to working with HAB/HPH over the design of the affordable housing part of the scheme”. This is not to be confused with predisposition where a member or councillor holds a view in favour of or against an issue - a planning application, for example - but has an open mind to the merits of an argument before making the final decision at the council meeting. Bias or the appearance of bias can be the basis of a legal challenge to the grant of planning permission, by way of an application to the High Court for judicial review, but this procedure is extremely expensive and the chances of succeeding (particularly in relation to alleged bias) are very slim indeed. But UCLA would like to track how it travels. [3] [2001] UKHL 67 Bias arises where a planning officer and/or councillor and/or inspector (the decision-maker) forms or shows bias against or in favour of a person, company or group, or a particular site or locality. On 21 January 2015, Wiltshire Council (the Council), as local planning authority, granted outline permission for a scheme of up to 35 custom-built residential dwellings, including nine affordable homes, on land near the River Wylye in Warminster. Yet, important points are left out of the rhetoric surrounding law enforcement implicit bias. The court heard the planning officer was married to a manager with Bloor. Bias arises where a planning officer and/or councillor and/or inspector (the decision-maker) forms or shows bias against or in favour of a person, company or group, or a particular site or locality. Last year, CBS News published the results of a nationwide survey of more than 150 police departments. We will only place cookies without your explicit consent where they are strictly necessary. LexisNexis, Scope of bias and pre-determination in planning cases, in subsequent case law on bias and pre-determination, Localism Act 2011 and bias and pre-determination, Interplay between the functions and responsibilities of planning inspectors and and bias and pre-determination. Promotion And Succession Planning When it comes to promotion and succession planning, the influence of unconscious bias is evident when we look at … GUIDANCE NOTE ON BIAS AND PREDETERMINATION IN THE PLANNING PROCESS What is Bias and Predetermination? Many HR leaders have taken steps to address this problem through unconscious bias training. Planning decision-makers are under a duty to act fairly. For Committee decisions, a planning officer, often referred to as the case officer, will prepare a formal report on the proposal recommending whether or not permission should be granted. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. The High Court has held in R (on the application of Piffs Elm Ltd) v Tewkesbury Council that a series of planning decisions were tainted by apparent bias where the case officer’s husband worked for a rival developer due to the potential impact of the Claimant’s proposals on land being promoted by the rival developer nearby. The decision should not therefore lead to a proliferation of apparent bias claims simply in instances where the relevant party is only loosely connected to the relevant cause. This content is no longer in use on Lexis, Bias and pre-determination in planning cases, Environmental impact assessment, strategic environmental assessment and appropriate assessment, Freedom of information and environmental information, Obtaining, amending and implementing planning permission, Planning conditions, obligations and the community infrastructure levy, Planning for nationally significant infrastructure, Planning issues in property and insolvency, Approach to need for out-of-town retail development different in Wales than England (Waterstone v Welsh Ministers), Court upholds three-year housing supply rule for neighbourhood plans (Richborough Estates), Planning ahead—rolling out the Housing and Planning Act 2016, Secretary of State has no duty to give reasons for not calling in planning application (Save Britain’s Heritage v SCLG), International Sales(Includes Middle East), Protecting human rights: Our Modern Slavery Act Statement, Copyright © 2021
These cookies are enabled at all times and are placed on your browser only in order to protect the integrity of our site and to ensure that we can remember your cookie preference settings the next time you visit.
Intellectual Property, Trade Marks & Designs. It is through the practice of the new skills developed during the program and their … had attended the planning committee meeting when the application was considered. Kelton v Wiltshire Council is an important reminder that decision-making in the planning world must be seen to be fair, impartial and open when considered from the perspective of an external observer. In the leading case of Porter v Magill [3], it was established that the test is “whether the fair-minded and informed observer, having considered the facts, would conclude that there was a real possibility that the tribunal was biased”. Consequently, individuals underestimate the likelihood of a disaster, when it might affect them, and its potential adverse effects. This is the case even if the interest in the matter does not arise via a link with the applicant for permission and/or if there is no legally-binding agreement with the applicant. The scheme was promoted by the applicants, HPH Ltd and HAB Housing. “We use your mobile number to send you your login credentials via SMS”, Navigate the law quickly and efficiently with Lexis. The matter had been considered carefully at the meeting, but Councillor Macdonald had participated in the decision-making nonetheless as SHA was (1) not the applicant and (2) had no formal agreement with the applicant at the time of the committee’s meeting. Planning fallacy: Underestimate the time and costs needed to complete a task. Planning decisions involve balancing many competing interests. Similarly, there was no pecuniary interest in the matter that was disclosable under the Localism Act 2011. Complete all the fields above to proceed to the next step. The court felt SHA would not have become so involved unless: The judge felt it would have taken something unforeseen to prevent SHA being appointed to deliver the affordable housing part of the scheme in due course. The other grounds of challenge were rejected. Myopia bias: See and interpret the world through the narrow lens of your own experiences, baggage, beliefs and assumptions. The decision will have been taken in bad faith and is liable to being quashed if challenged by way of judicial or statutory review. [2] In the High Court judgement Judge Jarman concluded that “there was a real possibility of apparent bias … You can disable the placement of these cookies at any time by using the toggle below. This financial interest meant he should have been automatically disqualified. The development would have a significant adverse impact on the River Avon Special Area of Conservation, particularly due to the risk of contamination to the River Wylye arising from the specialist foundations needed for the development. **Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. Mr Justice Cranston rejected the last three grounds of challenge submitted by Kelton, finding: However, due to SHA’s previous and likely future involvement in the Warminster scheme, Councillor Macdonald’s private interests as a director meant there was apparent bias. there was a serious interest in delivering the affordable housing element of the scheme; and. It involves situations where there is simply a concern of bias within the decision-making process towards one of the parties, rather than definitive proof. Using the case studies, McCormack recommends awareness raising as a start to combating unconscious bias. Fairness is not judged in the eyes of participant, who may “appreciate the nuance[s]” [4] of the application process more than an independent third party. The following Planning practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering: Bias and pre-determination can be an issue in planning cases where a planning decision-maker, including a local planning authority (LPA) or planning inspector, is determining a planning application or appeal. He also suggests labelling the types of bias likely to occur and creating structures or processes to slow down quick assessments and facilitate considered decision-making. In applying the test for apparent bias, the court will consider the background facts and circumstances of the case from the perspective of an informed, fair-minded observer. This website uses tools that involve analytical cookies which collect anonymous data to help us improve our site and to ensure that we can offer the best experience to its users. The facts created the appearance that SHA and the applicants were working closely together. To view our latest legal guidance content,sign-in to Lexis®PSL or register for a free trial. BIAS offers a range of key services for business advisory, cash flow management, succession planning as well as a full financial control service. The Councillor had no direct pecuniary or proprietary interest in the planning application, so could still participate in the decision as to whether or not to grant permission. it had reason to believe the tender would most likely be awarded to SHA once outline permission had been granted. The decision must be quashed unless the interest was so small that it could have played no part in swaying the decision-maker's mind, ‘apparent’ bias: this is where a decision-maker does not have a personal interest in a case but their conduct and behaviour give rise to a suspicion that the decision-maker is not impartial, The modern law on apparent bias comes from the, Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. For, This Practice Note provides guidance on claims for ‘use and occupation’ or mesne profits, and how and when double rent or double value can be claimed.Claims for use and occupationA claim for use and occupation is possible where there is occupation of land without an express agreement fixing the, This Practice Note considers the doctrine of forum non conveniens, also referred to as the appropriate forum or the proper place for a dispute to be determined. The judge rejected the suggestion that Councillor Macdonald should have been automatically disqualified from involvement in the planning committee when the relevant decision was being made. Contact: 01635 886633. For more information about the specific types of cookies used, please read our Privacy & Cookies Notice. Where a decision is clearly in a Councillor’s interest, apparent bias can be found. While it was accepted that there had been no final decision made as to whether SHA would bid for the scheme, this was irrelevant. MEES – minimum energy efficiency standards for the private rented sector, Section 17 rent arrears notices: An interesting case, Legislation alerter: Home businesses excluded from 1954 Act security of tenure, Unlawful assignment and forfeiture – no free pass for administrators, Anchor tenants, exclusivity and competition law, Planning Team successfully defend planning permission following High Court challenge, Key advice for developers following the Supreme Court Mistley Quay TVG case, Corsearch acquires anti-piracy specialist, Entura International, New and emerging technology: protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights, Offers a new way to plan and control legal spend. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. Video Credit: BruinX, UCLA Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion. This website uses cookies to ensure the best possible user experience. The planning system works best when officers and councillors involved in planning understand their roles and responsibilities, and the context and constraints in which they operate. While there should not have been automatic disqualification and no direct pecuniary interest existed, Councillor Macdonald’s participation gave cause for concern. In a letter to the Penn State community, President Eric Barron outlined his plan to advance the work of the Select Penn State Presidential Commission on Racism, Bias, and Community Safety as part of ongoing efforts to create a more diverse and welcoming University community. The act may be described as involuntary, but will not be regarded as such. However, it is interesting to note that the court did highlight a distinction between councillors’ general interests and private interests in relevant matters. With LexisPSL, you can. You can change the way cookies are used through your internet browser settings but can also update your preferences through settings. Sign up for a regular round up of key legislation. National Planning Policy Framework states that enforcement can be important for maintaining public confidence in the planning system, but enforcement action is discretionary and must be proportionate.2 The Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) on effective enforcement published by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) Bias, whatever its origins, does not have to result in discrimination. To effectively mitigate bias, HR leaders should introduce tactical interventions or “nudges” into their existing succession management processes to increase visibility of diverse talent and enable objective decision making. Whatever the intentions behind the behaviour of the parties involved, the appearance created was that SHA, HPH and HAB had been working together closely and had shared interests. The strength of this appearance alone led to the finding of apparent bias, so committee’s decision was flawed. The IACP/UC Research Center partnered with the John F. Finn Institute for Public Safety to evaluate an implicit bias training for the New York City Police Department (NYPD). Unconscious bias training recently became mandatory for every police officer in Minnesota to take in order to maintain their peace officers license PoliceOne Editorial Advisory Board Member Booker Hodges presented a session on Unconscious Bias Training for Law Enforcement at the 125th International Association of Chiefs of Police Annual Conference in Orlando, Florida. Many of the rioters had a lot in common with the officials in charge of doing threat assessments in the … [1] [2015] EWHC 2853 (Admin) It is useless to accuse a public officer of bias merely because he is predisposed in favor of some policy in the public interest. Brick by Brick is overseen by Cllr Alison Butler, Croydon Cabinet Member for Homes, Regeneration and Planning. However, there should not be participation in the relevant meeting or decision if his/her private interest is engaged. The Claimant, Kelton, was a riparian owner, living approximately 700 metres downstream from the proposed development.
Business Advisory and Virtual CFO services in Adelaide, Australia. that there would be no likely harm to heritage assets. Predetermination is a more accurate term than ‘bias’, to describe a state of mind which is capable of breaching both the law and the Code. Planning applications have to be decided in line with the relevant local planning authority’s (LPA) development plan – unless there is a very good reason not to do so. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. the Council had sufficient objective information to reach its conclusion that there was no likely significant effect on the conservation area; the screening opinion was not flawed; and. Implicit bias is the new catchphrase for what is wrong with the nation’s police officers and law enforcement in general. A personal action-planning process creates a customized road map for participants to address unconscious bias and gain traction for creating sustainable practices. Nearly half rated the likelihood of using all five bias- How to Mitigate Bias in Succession Planning In 2019, over half of heads of D&I identified influencing succession planning efforts as a top priority in 2019. To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial. However, insights from training often fail to “stick” and sustain behavior change. Planning decision-makers are under a duty to act fairly. If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. Pre-determination is where the decision-maker approaches a decision with a ‘closed mind’. Learn how to effectively combat bias in succession planning by implementing tactical interventions in key areas to increase visibility of diverse talent and enable objective decision making. The not-for-profit organisation, Selwood Housing Association (SHA), also featured in the case due to their interest in the affordable housing element of the development. The problem of bias arising from preconceived notions may have to be disposed of as an inherent limitation of the administrative process. See Practice Note: Determining planning applications—procedure. A JUDGE has exonerated high-ranking local figures, including the Thames Valley police and crime commissioner, in a lawsuit concerning Newbury Showground. The scheme was promoted by the applicants, HPH Ltd and HAB Housing. Involvement as a housing association director will not always be an ‘issue’ in most applications before a planning committee. SHA was not the applicant for the planning permission and, at the time the decision was made, had no contract with the developers. Call Today to find out more about how BIAS can assist. This report is then considered by the Planning Committee, which is made up of elected councillors, who make the decision. Cranston J stated: “It was plainly in [SHA’s] interests and Cllr Macdonald’s, as director, for the application to be approved. We feel there is clear conflict of interest within the council's planning committee, and a bias towards their own developer The police chief on the Hawaiian island of Kauai mocked people of Asian descent and in one case “squinted his eyes” and bowed his head while mimicking someone with a Japanese accent, a discrimination investigation found. social problem and felt individually motivated to act without bias. Mr Justice Cranston stressed that the specific circumstances of the case here were indicative. For further information or advice on the impact of this decision and other recent legal developments in this area, please contact Walker Morris’ Planning & Environment team. The answer is about bias, according to Eddy. [4] Kelton para. Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences! However, Councillor Macdonald’s participation gave rise to an appearance of potential bias as defined in Porter v Magill. This website uses cookies to protect the security of the site and to ensure that we can provide the best possible user experience. In most instances, apparent bias is still more likely to be found where the relevant party is either the planning applicant or bound by legal agreement to the applicant. As a director of SHA, Councillor Macdonald received £3,000 per annum. Existing user? SHA, with Councillor Macdonald as a director, was not just an affordable housing provider – in fact it: Due to the previous involvement and prospects of future involvement in the scheme, Councillor Macdonald’s private interests came to the fore. For more information about cookies and the types of cookies we use please read our Privacy & Cookies Notice. Cllr Butler is married to Cllr Paul Scott, who is the chair of Croydon's planning committee. Kelton challenged the Council’s decision on four grounds: In relation to Ground 1, bias was alleged on the basis that: In response, the Council argued that the planning committee had been aware of the potential for bias and Councillor Macdonald had declared his role on the SHA board. The Claimant, Kelton, w… Clearly, where a decision-maker is biased or has pre-determined a decision, they will not be acting fairly. Maintaining fairness throughout is key if challenges are to be avoided. As Cranston J noted: “[SHA] may have built up goodwill with its advice to [HPH and HAB] over a period, but at the time of the grant of planning permission the affordable housing part of the development was yet to be tendered”. In fact, SHA had not even tendered for the role as affordable housing provider at this stage. There should have been disclosure of the Councillor’s pecuniary interest in the planning permission being obtained, as per the requirements under the Localism Act 2011. The Council had incorrectly concluded that there would be no harm to heritage assets. Office-holders have various duties and powers in order to ensure that they do this. That Councillor Magnus Macdonald, a member of the Council’s planning committee, should not have participated in the decision-making due to his role as a director of SHA. Take a free trial
In broad terms, the Court held that the Tribunal comprehensively assessed the issue of apprehended bias in its consideration of the following two questions: “whether the discussions at the pre-application meetings give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias” and “whether the Council officer’s recommendation to approve the application gives rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias”. Any assessment for possible bias will therefore be on a case-by-case, fact-specific basis. So, if you, or your school, organization, company, or club uses it for education purposes, please let them know at WeListen@equity.ucla.edu (link sends e-mail). Flood Re: will changes to the flood insurance market pour cold water on the commercial property sector? Force field bias: Think, feel, and act in ways that reduce a perceived threat, anxiety or fear. In doing this, decision makers need an ethos of decision-making in the wider public interest on what can be had expressed a clear interest in delivering it; had been mentioned by the applicants as their potential partner, particularly in the design documents forming part of the application; had written in support of the application to the planning committee; and. [2] For example, if: (1) the decision-maker (or a member of the decision-making body) has a direct financial interest in the decision; and (2) the decision is proven to have been influenced by this. A Councillor can hold a general interest in a matter or decision before him/her. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Council ordered to pay £48M damages + costs. The law on bias and predetermination (which is a particular form of bias) … Bias on Account of Obstinacy Normalcy bias, or normality bias, is a cognitive bias which leads people to disbelieve or minimize threat warnings. 1rwhv 0hpehuv ,qwhuhvwv %ldv dqg 3uh ghwhuplqdwlrq uhodwlqj wr 3odqqlqj 0dwwhuv )dlu dqg 8qeldvhg 'hflvlrq 0dnlqj 0hpehuv vkrxog frqvlghu doo 3odqqlqj 0dwwhuv rq wkhlu lqglylgxdo phulwv In particular, there had been a public statement made regarding SHA’s strong position as part of any tender to deliver the affordable housing. R. v Bassetlaw ex parte Oxby (Dec 1997) The High Court declared as illegal and void a grant of planning consent tainted by actual or apparent bias. This doctrine is of relevance when determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to hear a dispute and is applied, Definition of automatismAn act is done in a state of automatism if it is done by the body without control by the mind, (eg it is a spasm or a reflex), or if it is done by a person who is not conscious of what they are doing. The rules of natural justice are well-known and accepted, so that decisions where there has been actual bias [2] by the decision-maker are not traditionally enforceable. The not-for-profit organisation, Selwood Housing Association (SHA), also featured in the case due to their interest in the affordable housing element of the development.